Korrektur < Korrekturlesen < Englisch < Sprachen < Vorhilfe
|
| Status: |
(Frage) beantwortet  | | Datum: | 10:04 Di 11.08.2009 | | Autor: | Dinker |
Guten MOrgen
Wäre dankbar um Korrektur
The most facts the reader experiences through the boy’s dialogues. Sometimes the author intervenes to give important information, but he doesn’t evaluate the events and remains objective.
Sometimes the author leaves the group and follows one single boy, for example when Simone withdraws to his hideout or the manhunt in the last part we follows Ralph and sympathizes with hopeless situation. Because we can feel with him, the author forces us to forget being objective.
In conclusion you can say, that the author only observe the events and keep impartial.
They begin to act without any sense of ethics, moral or civilisation values.
Bradbury picked up several contemporary topics at this time. But a lot of this themes aren’t less irrelevant today.
In chapter 16 the philosophy discussion between Mond and John takes places. Their different value systems becomes very obviously.
Danke
Gruss DInker
|
|
| |
|
| Status: |
(Antwort) fertig  | | Datum: | 21:50 So 16.08.2009 | | Autor: | senex |
(The most facts the reader experiences) Most of the facts the reader obtains through the boy’s dialogues. Sometimes the author intervenes to give important information, but he doesn’t evaluate the events and remains objective.
Sometimes the author leaves the group and follows one single boy, for example when Simone withdraws to his hideout or during the manhunt in the last part where we follow Ralph and sympathize with the hopeless situation. Because we can feel with him, the author forces us to forget being objective.
In conclusion you can say, that the author only observes the events and (keep) stays impartial.
They begin to act without any sense of ethics, moral or civilisation values.
Bradbury picked up several contemporary topics at this time. But a lot of these themes aren’t (less)? irrelevant today .
In chapter 16 the philosoph(y)ical discussion between Mond and John takes places. Their different value systems become(s) very obvious(ly).
|
|
|
|
